© 2017 Elena Fawkner
"I have had to change my email address to [deleted], as usa.net
This is an extract from a "change of address" email I received a
couple of weeks ago from a subscriber. No, indeed, the internet
business environment is most certainly NOT what it used to be.
More and more we are expected to pay for access to services we
used to be able to get (and expect to get) for free.
Why do we expect so much for so little online? Because that's
how the internet evolved. Originally a network of computers designed
to facilitate an exchange of information and resources between
academics, the fact that purely academic pursuits were the goal
naturally meant that it was perfectly appropriate for the educational
institutions involved to put that infrastructure in place without
expecting the end users to directly pay for the content.
As recent history has evolved, of course, the internet has expanded
WAY beyond its humble academic beginnings to its current status
as a primary medium of exchange of information, products and
services for virtually every sector of the economy. How often do you
see an advertisement, whether print, radio or television that doesn't
give the advertiser's web address as a matter of course?
Although business has become the hugely predominant exploiter of
the medium, the fascination with the technology has, until now,
somehow kept the focus off business basics ... you know, all those
minor issues such as actually making a profit and pesky details such
So enamored were we, as consumers, with the sheer power and
brilliance of being able to access, with just a few keystrokes,
information on literally any subject under the sun that took our fancy,
coupled with the not-for-profit academic beginnings of the internet
revolution, the idea that someone, somewhere, presumably had to
foot the bill for all of this was nothing more than some sort of
abstract issue we needn't concern ourselves with. It was someone
else's problem. Someone else was profiting from all of this and
whoever that was should pay. It really didn't dawn on us that we
were the ones who were truly profiting.
This "free" mentality was a major contributor to the downfall of the
first e-commerce wave. Venture capitalists, probably more caught
up in the promise of this bright new technology than anyone, were
prepared to throw money at this thing with the curious blind faith
that somewhere, somehow, this new playing field was a source of
riches never before dreamed of. So quarter after quarter, year after
year, undeterred by the red ink dripping like blood off corporate
balance sheets, the VCs kept sinking more and more money into the
black hole, holding steadfast to their irrational faith that somewhere
in this brave new world was a rich reserve of untold wealth that they
would reap if only they drilled deep enough and long enough to reach
The recipients of this free-flowing cash, of course, had to find a
way to make money so they could eventually pay it back. Business
models were created that revolved around providing free content
(because the internet, after all, was a "free" medium) and charging
third party advertisers exorbitant prices for the privilege of displaying
their advertising to the vast numbers of site visitors clicking in and out
of their websites every few seconds. Perfect! Site visitors receive
their *entitlement* of free information and we'll make our money from
advertising revenue, these site owners decided.
What they didn't count on, however, was that the "free" mentality
of online consumers brought with it a built-in resistance to actually
paying for *anything* online. And that included the products and
services offered by these high-paying advertisers. Disillusioned with
the disappointing return from their online advertising ventures,
advertisers began to cut back their online advertising budgets and,
lo and behold, the website owners experienced dwindling revenues.
Dwindling revenues meant they couldn't service the exorbitant finance
costs associated with their oh-so-generous venture capital loans,
the VCs finally woke up to the reality that money was generated
online in just the same way as it was generated offline (payment for
products and services) and decided to cut their losses, calling up
loans. Mega web-based businesses went out of business left, right
and center, finally culminating in the great e-commerce shakeout of
So, for those with web sites and ezines providing information and
relying in large part upon advertising revenues to make profits, the
(temporary) advertising squeeze has created something of a
challenge. If these publishers don't receive a return on their
investment from advertising revenue, what happens? Yep - they
start looking for alternative sources of revenue and that means
charging the end user. Such sacrilege!
Well, I'm here to say it's nothing of the sort. Of course we should
pay for what we use. Western nations are capitalist societies of
capitalist consumers. Why on earth should we expect someone
to put in the time and effort of providing a valuable service or product
without compensation? Do we really think that all those great web
sites out there are nothing but a hobby for their hard-working owners?
Some of them are, admittedly, but many belong to hardworking
people, wanting to provide a valuable product or service but yet get
paid for their efforts. By someone. If not advertisers, then all that's
left are the end users ... those who, when all is said and done,
directly benefit from the service.
So, what does this great counter-revolution mean for you and your
business? Well, for you, it means get used to the idea of paying for
what you use online, just as you do offline. For your information-
based business, if you're not generating enough income from
advertisers, it means get used to the idea of charging for your content.
And don't apologize. You work hard and are entitled to be paid for it.
Elena Fawkner is editor of A Home-Based Business Online.
Copyright 1998-2017, AHBBO.com. All rights are reserved. 2017